| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| Notes to the group
financial statements |
|
| for the year ended
31 March 2006 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
| |
| |
| 58. |
Insurance
risk |
 |
The group issues contracts
that transfer insurance risk or financial
risk or both. Insurance contracts are those
that transfer significant insurance
risk, being the possibility of having to
pay benefits on the occurrence of
an insured event that are at least 10% more
than the benefits payable if the insured
event did not occur. Such insurance contracts
are issued by the group’s five
insurance subsidiary companies, namely,
Guardrisk Insurance, Guardrisk Life, Euroguard
Insurance, Alexander Forbes Insurance and
Alexander Forbes Life, as detailed below.
The group also issues contracts which are
classified as investment contracts.
These contracts transfer financial
risk with no significant insurance
risk. Financial risk is defined as
the risk of a possible future change in
one or more of a specified interest
rate, financial instrument price,
commodity price, foreign exchange rate,
index of process or rates or credit index
or other variable. The group’s multi-manager
investment subsidiary company, Investment
Solutions, operates under a long-term insurance
licence however, for accounting purposes,
the contracts issued by this subsidiary
company to policyholders are classified
as investment contracts. The assets arising
from these investment contracts are directly
matched by linked obligations to the policyholders
and the assets and linked obligations are
separately reflected in the group
balance sheet as “Financial assets
held under multi-manager investment contracts”
and “Financial liabilities held under
multi-manager investment contracts”
respectively.
Three of the group’s insurance subsidiary
companies, namely Guardrisk Insurance, Guardrisk
Life and Euroguard Insurance, provide cell
captive insurance facilities for clients.
These facilities are classified as
special purpose entities and the recognition
of transactions relating to these facilities
in the financial statements depends
on the nature of the cell captive insurance
arrangement. The insurance companies participate
with some of the cell shareholders in the
underwriting risks of the business written
in the cells. The assets and liabilities
relating to these risk taking activities
are included in the relevant line items
in the group financial statements
and are included in the insurance related
liabilities shown below. Surplus funds in
the cells are invested in investment portfolios
and are separately reflected in the
group balance sheet as “Assets of
cell captive insurance facilities”
with a corresponding liability reflected
as “Liabilities of cell captive insurance
facilities”.
The remaining two insurance subsidiaries
transact conventional short-term and long-term
insurance business under limited risk taking
mandates.
The names of the insurance subsidiary companies
issuing insurance contracts and the nature
of their insurance operations are detailed
below. |
| |
| Name
of subsidiary company |
Country
of operation |
Nature
of insurance operations |
Note
reference |
Guardrisk Insurance
Company Limited |
South Africa,
Namibia and Mauritius |
Cell captive and
contingency
short-term insurance |
58.2 |
| Guardrisk Life
Limited |
South Africa
and Mauritius |
Cell captive and
promoter
long-term insurance |
58.2 |
Euroguard Insurance
Company Limited |
Gibraltar |
Cell
captive short-term insurance |
58.2 |
Alexander Forbes
Insurance Company Limited |
South
Africa |
Personal
lines short-term insurance |
58.3 |
| Alexander Forbes
Life Limited |
South Africa |
Long-term insurance |
58.4 |
|
| |
The insurance contracts
liabilities of insurance subsidiaries included
within the group balance sheet at the year
end are detailed below. |
| |
 |
|
2006
Rm |
2005
Rm |
| |
Nature
of liability |
 |
 |
| |
Net unearned premium
provision from short-term insurance
contracts |
16 |
14 |
| |
Gross
unearned premium provision |
17 |
19 |
| |
Reinsurers’
share of unearned premium provision |
(1) |
(5) |
| |
Net outstanding
claims provision from short-term insurance
contracts |
31 |
25 |
| |
Gross
outstanding claims provision |
38 |
104 |
| |
Reinsurers’
share of outstanding claims provision |
(7) |
(79) |
| |
Net IBNR provision
from short-term insurance contracts |
13 |
23 |
| |
Gross
IBNR provision |
14 |
23 |
| |
Reinsurers’
share of IBNR provision |
(1) |
—
|
| |
Policyholder liability
under long-term insurance contracts
(life fund) |
10 |
8 |
| |
Gross
policyholder liability |
73 |
65 |
| |
Reinsurers’
share of policyholder liability |
(63) |
(57) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Net liabilities
under insurance contracts |
70 |
70 |
|
|
| |
58.1 |
General management
of insurance risk |
 |
 |
In
addition to the management of insurance
risk by each subsidiary (as detailed below
in sections 58.2, 58.3
and 58.4), the group has
the following general insurance risk management
controls.
Underwriting committees
The group has underwriting committees which
consider both underwriting and counter party
exposures of short-term and long-term insurance
contracts in order to control the risk exposure
of the group. These committees review the
underwriting processes of the insurance
subsidiaries including the pricing and acceptance
criteria, underwriting limits and monitor
the emerging trends and issues. The appropriateness
and results of the reinsurance programmes
relevant to the insurance contracts and
the matching of assets and liabilities arising
from the insurance contracts is reviewed.
These committees also consider and approve
the appropriateness and viability of major
product development initiatives and the
conformity of these products with regulatory,
legal, tax and accounting requirements.
Individuals with specialised industry and
product knowledge are members of these committees
and external experts are also co-opted when
necessary. These committees report directly
to the relevant operational boards of directors
and comprise executive and non-executive
directors and independent specialists.
The underwriting committees and their relevant
operational boards monitor compliance by
the insurance subsidiaries with their limited
risk taking mandates.
Audit committees
The group has audit committees specifically
for the insurance subsidiaries. These committees
serve to satisfy the group and operational
board of directors that adequate internal
and financial controls are in place
and that material risks are managed appropriately.
These committees report directly to the
relevant board of directors and comprise
a majority of non-executive directors. The
committees are attended by the external
and internal auditors.
Statutory actuaries
The statutory actuaries of the long-term
insurance subsidiaries report annually on
the capital adequacy and the financial
soundness at the year end date and for the
foreseeable future. All new premium rates
are reviewed by the statutory actuaries
and dividends are approved prior to payment
to ensure that the insurance subsidiaries
remain financially sound thereafter.
Capital adequacy requirements
A minimum level of solvency is held within
each insurance subsidiary to meet the regulatory
capital adequacy requirements. For the long-term
insurance subsidiaries, the capital adequacy
requirement (“CAR”) is calculated
to determine whether the excess of assets
over liabilities is sufficient to
provide for the possibility of actual future
experience departing from the assumptions
made in calculating the policyholder liabilities
and against fluctuations in the value
of assets. CAR statutory returns are submitted
to the Registrar of Long-Term Insurance
on a quarterly basis and valuations performed
by the statutory actuary on an annual basis.
As at 31 March 2006, the CAR held by the
long-term insurance companies amounted to
R28 million.
The short-term insurance subsidiary companies
are required by statute to create a contingency
reserve for adverse claims developments.
This reserve is calculated at ten percent
of net written premiums as defined
by the relevant legislation and no distribution
can be made from this reserve without the
prior approval of the Registrar of Short-Term
Insurance. As at 31 March 2006, the contingency
reserve held by the short-term insurance
companies for all their lines of business
written amounted to R183 million. In addition
to the contingency reserve, the short-term
insurance companies are required by statute
to maintain a solvency margin of 15% of
net written premiums.
Two of the insurance subsidiaries, Guardrisk
Insurance and Guardrisk Life, are rated
by an international rating agency, Global
Credit Rating, and have financial
strength ratings of AA and A+ respectively.
Concentration risk
The group is not exposed to any significant
concentration risk as the insurance contracts
issued by the group’s insurance subsidiaries
are adequately spread across the major classes
of insurance risks. In addition, each insurance
subsidiary company is cognisant of concentration
risk for their individual entity and each
insurance product and takes steps to mitigate
this risk, including purchasing reinsurance
protection.
Reinsurance
The group uses reinsurance to manage the
level of underwriting risk accepted by the
group. Reinsurance vetting procedures are
in place and reinsurance programmes are
assessed on a regular basis to ensure appropriateness
of the cover obtained, including the individual
cessions and accumulations per reinsurer.
The financial condition of reinsurers
(identified by their credit rating)
are considered when placing reinsurance
cover and evaluated on an ongoing basis.
The individual insurance subsidiaries limit
the level of reinsurance credit risk accepted
by placing limits on their exposures to
a single counterparty.
The individual insurance subsidiary companies
hold catastrophe reinsurance to mitigate
the risk of a single event causing multiple
accumulation of claims.
The group has a Market Security Committee
which evaluates, approves and monitors both
insurance and reinsurance markets that the
group operates in and reports back to the
relevant operational boards with recommendations.
The insurance subsidiaries are represented
on this committee. Committee decisions are
supported by local and international professional
rating agencies and the involvement of the
Financial Services Board, legal advisers
and industry is sought if required. |
| |
58.2 |
Cell captive arrangements
– conducted by Guardrisk Insurance,
Guardrisk Life and Euroguard Insurance |
| |
|
Terms and
conditions of insurance contracts |
| |
|
The companies transact
primarily as cell captive and alternative
risk transfer insurers focusing on the corporate
and retail markets.
The following structured insurance and risk
financing solutions are offered:
Cell captive: A cell
captive is a contractual arrangement entered
into between the company and the cell shareholder
whereby the risks and rewards associated
with certain insurance activities accrue
to the cell shareholder. Cell captives allow
clients to purchase separate classes of
shares (or a “cell”) in the
registered insurance company which undertakes
the professional insurance and financial
management of the cell including underwriting,
reinsurance, claims management, actuarial
and statistical analyses and investment
and accounting services. The terms and conditions
of the cell are governed by shareholders
agreements.
There are currently two distinct types of
cell captive arrangements being: •
“First party”
where the risks that are being insured relate
to the cell shareholder’s or its group’s
own operations; and • “Third
party” where the cell shareholder
is provided the opportunity to sell branded
insurance products into its own customer
base. The companies are the principal to
the insurance contract, although the business
is underwritten on behalf of the cell shareholder.
Contingency or rent-a-captive
(Guardrisk Insurance): A policy
contract structured to provide entry-level
insurance cover for first party risks
without capitalising a cell. The policy
provides for payment of a performance bonus
to the insured based on the underwriting
results at the end of the policy period.
Promoter policies (Guardrisk
Life): A policy contract structured
to provide insurance cover for first
and third party risks, without capitalising
a cell. The promoter policies consist of
a mixture of third party assurance business,
first party group life cover and first
party annuity contracts which fund the contract
holder’s obligation for post-retirement
health care liabilities in terms of accounting
standard, IAS 19 (AC116).
In terms of IFRS, the cell captive arrangements
are classified as special purpose
entities and the recognition of the cells
in the financial statements of the
company depends on the nature and contractual
conditions of the cell captives’ facilities.
First party cell owners are regarded as
having the right to obtain the majority
of the future economic benefits of
the cell’s insurance activities and
for this reason first party cells
are not consolidated in the group accounts.
In the case of third party cells, the company
is regarded as the principal to the insurance
transaction. The company however in substance,
reinsures this business to the cell shareholder
as the cell shareholder remains responsible
for the solvency of the cell. Such cells
are included in the financial statements
but are accounted for as reinsurance ceded
to the cell shareholders. Contingency facilities
and promoter policies are fully recognised
in the financial statements. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Risks that
arise from insurance contracts |
| |
|
Contracts underwritten
in cell structures are considered to be
the primary responsibility of the cell shareholder.
The primary risk that the group is exposed
to relating to its cell captive insurance
business is the credit risk of the cell
shareholder. This exposure is dealt with
under credit risk. In the case of third
party cell captive arrangements, the group
is also exposed to insurance risk on policies
issued to the cell shareholders’ customer
base (to the extent that there is reinsurance
failure, if present, and failure to recapitalise
by the cell shareholder).
In respect of the contingency policies,
the risks underwritten are mainly in respect
of primary layers of an insurance programme.
In these facilities as opposed to traditional
insurance models the premium partially funds
the risk exposure.
Some of the companies participate with several
of their cell shareholders in the underwriting
risks of their business. These companies
carefully evaluate all retention of risks
in terms of statistical and underwriting
disciplines, as well as specific and
limited board mandates for each insurance
programme. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Mitigation
of insurance risk |
| |
|
Insurance
risk
In respect of third party cell captive arrangements,
the insurance risks are mitigated through
the reinsurance of elements of the risk
to reinsurance markets and/or the cell shareholders
through the cell shareholder agreements.
The risks are further reduced by the requirement
for the first and third party cells
to hold minimum levels of capital.
In respect of contingency policies, policyholders
share in the underwriting result if there
is favourable claims experience. The companies
limit their exposure to unfavourable claims
experience by performing actuarial analyses
to establish suitable policy and cover limits
as well as attachment points for reinsurance
where applicable.
Reinsurance strategy
The companies manage the insurance risks
through their underwriting strategies and
reinsurance arrangements. The underwriting
strategy is intended to ensure that the
risks underwritten are well diversified
in terms of type of risk and the level of
insured benefits.
Facultative reinsurance facilities are in
place where considered necessary and proportional
reinsurance treaties are used when deemed
necessary. The companies reinsure the excess
over the retentions under a variety of quota
share and surplus reinsurance arrangements.
In certain contracts, stop loss reinsurance
arrangements protect the retained line against
attritional losses. In respect of contingency
policies, an umbrella reinsurance facility
is structured above the policies on a portfolio
basis to protect the risk layers provided.
The risk retained in the companies is low
under the current contracts.
Sensitivity analysis
As a result of the nature of the business
written, the level of exposure to the group
to sensitivity in assumptions of insurance
contract provisions is insignificant. |
| |
58.3 |
Personal lines
short-term insurance – conducted
by Alexander Forbes Insurance |
| |
|
Terms and
conditions of insurance contracts |
| |
|
Personal lines insurance
is provided to the general public in their
individual capacities. The duration of this
insurance is monthly and in some cases,
annual. The classes of risk underwritten
by the company include property, accident,
personal accident and motor. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Risks that
arise from insurance contracts |
| |
|
Insurance risk |
| |
|
This business activity
relates to the assumption of the risk of
loss from events involving persons. As such,
the company is exposed to the uncertainty
surrounding the timing, severity and frequency
of claims under insurance contracts. As
insurance events are random, actual experience
may vary from what was estimated using established
statistical techniques.
The majority of the company’s insurance
contracts are “short-tail”,
meaning that any claim is settled within
one year after the loss date. The company’s
“long-tail” exposures are limited
to personal accident, third party motor
and public liability. Claims in respect
of long-tail business comprises less than
0,1% of an average year’s claims cost
and are not considered a major risk to the
group.
There is no significant concentration
of risk as the company’s risks are
adequately spread across the country as
well as across the major classes of insurance
risk. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Mitigation
of insurance risks |
| |
|
Insurance risk |
| |
|
Insurance risk is managed
by centralised control of pricing and acceptance
criteria, underwriting limits, reinsurance
and continual monitoring of emerging issues. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Reinsurance strategy |
| |
|
The company reinsures
its business on a non proportional basis.
The personal lines book is protected on
a per risk and catastrophe basis, capping
the net exposure of the company in the event
of a single large loss or loss occurrence
constituting a catastrophe.
The personal accident book of business is
profitable, being a high volume low
risk portfolio and is protected on a stop
loss basis whereby reinsurance protection
is purchased to protect the company in the
event of adverse claims experience. Being
monthly business this is considered a well
managed portfolio. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Sensitivity
analysis |
| |
|
The
most sensitive assumptions in the claims
provisioning for the personal lines business
relate to assumptions used in the calculation
of IBNR. A 50% deviation from these assumptions
would result in a change to the company’s
pre-taxation results of not greater than
R1,5 million. |
| |
58.4 |
Long-term insurance
– conducted by Alexander Forbes
Life |
| |
|
Terms and
conditions of insurance contracts |
| |
|
The insurance contracts
consist of annually renewable group life
mortality and morbidity contracts and individual
life mortality and morbidity contracts.
Group business consists of insurance for
retirement funds and other group schemes
and covers the contingencies of death and
disability. Individual life business covers
death, disability and impairment contingencies.
There are no surrender values or investment
components inherent in any of these policies. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Risks that
arise from insurance contracts |
| |
|
These contracts insure
events associated with human life (for example
death, or survival) over a long duration.
The group assurance business is subject
to mortality and morbidity risk. The risk
is that future claims will exceed expectations,
which could result from epidemics such as
AIDS and Avian Flu, as well as unexpected
changes in lifestyles and living patterns.
Since the term of a group policy is typically
one year and upfront costs are limited,
the risk of non-recoupment of expenses due
to withdrawals is limited.
The company launched an individual assurance
product during the current financial
year. As at 31 March 2006 it remains a relatively
minor part of the company’s exposure.
The product is subject to mortality, morbidity,
withdrawal and expense risk.
The company is exposed to concentration
risk on the group assurance business as
the company does not as yet have a wide
spread of group schemes and a single event
could result in multiple claims. The company
holds catastrophe reinsurance to mitigate
this risk. The company has no significant
concentration risk on the individual assurance
business due to the current low level of
business on this product. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Mitigation
of insurance risk |
| |
|
Insurance risk
In respect of group assurance business,
free cover limits are set on a per scheme
basis and are formula-driven, taking into
account the number of lives assured and
their average sum assured. Sums assured
in excess of the free cover limit are medically
tested. Policy terms and conditions allow
for an annual review of premium rates so
allowing the company to keep premiums in
line with emerging claims experience. The
annual premium reviews take all pertinent
information from one year to the next into
account.
In respect of individual assurance business,
the major risks are mortality, morbidity
and withdrawal. Premiums on this business
line are differentiated by age, gender and
smoker status. Stringent socio-economic
qualification criteria apply. Future
premium rates are also not guaranteed and
may be adjusted if mortality and morbidity
experience worsens. Market pressures and
delays in implementing changes could however
counter this mitigating effect. Withdrawal
risk is mitigated to some extent by commission
clawbacks clauses in contracts with intermediaries.
Reinsurance strategy
The company also manages the insurance risks
through its reinsurance arrangements. The
company assesses the appropriate reinsurance
structures by conducting scenario analyses
which project outcomes under different reinsurance
structures. The retention limits are then
set in accordance with the company’s
risk appetite. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Sensitivity
analysis |
| |
|
The
most critical assumption underlying the
liabilities relating to group assurance
is the rate of recovery from illness or
disability associated with claims in payment.
The sensitivity to a recovery rate 20% lower
than assumed is less than R1 million.
The negative liabilities arising from the
individual assurance contracts are less
than R1 million and any sensitivity to the
assumptions are currently insignificant. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|